- I. Introduction
- 1.1 Understanding Conflicts and Disputes; Modes of Dispute Resolution
- 1.2 Evaluation of Litigation in India; ADR Meaning, Scope, and Need, ADR v/s Litigation, Types of ADR
- 1.3 ADR Techniques: Negotiation, Mini Trial, and Online Dispute Resolution, Court annexed ADR systems: An overview
- 1.4 International Framework: UNCITRAL Model Laws and Singapore Convention
- II. Arbitration under Act of 1996 – I
- Arbitration under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 :
- 2.1 Historical Evolution of Arbitration Law in India
- 2.2 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
- 2.2.1 Salient Features
- 2.2.2 Amendments: Need and objectives
- 2.3 Arbitration: Meaning, definition and kinds
- 2.3.1 Domestic and international commercial arbitrations
- 2.4 Receipt of written communications and waiver of right to object
- 2.5 Arbitration Agreement:
- 2.5.1 Meaning, Definition, Essentials, Kinds and validity of Arbitration
- Agreement
- 2.5.2 Who can enter into Arbitration agreement
- 2.5.3 Power of parties to refer to arbitration
- 2.6 Arbitral Tribunal: Definition and Composition:
- 2.6.1 Number, Appointment and Arbitral Tribunal
- 2.6.2 Duties of Arbitral Tribunal including disclosures
- 2.6.3 Grounds of Challenge, procedure for challenge
- 2.6.4 Termination of mandate and substitution of Arbitrator
- 2.7 Court
- 2.7.1 Definition under the Act
- 2.7.2 Jurisdiction
- 2.7.3 Extent of judicial intervention
- 2.7.4 Interim measures by Court
- 2.8 Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal
- 2.8.1 Doctrine of Competence-Competence
- 2.8.2 Interim measures by Arbitral Tribunal- provisions and enforcement
- III. Arbitration under Act of 1996 – II
- Arbitration under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 :
- 3.1 Conduct of Arbitral Proceedings
- 3.1.1 Administrative Assistance
- 3.1.2 Equal treatment of the parties
- 3.1.3 Determining the rules of procedures
- 3.1.4 Place of arbitration
- 3.1.5 Commencement of proceedings
- 3.1.6 Language
- 3.1.7 Pleadings
- 3.1.8 Hearings
- 3.1.9 Default of a party
- 3.1.10 Expert appointment
- 3.1.11Court assistance
- 3.2 Arbitral Award:
- 3.2.1 Definition, requirements and ingredients
- 3.2.2 Applicability of Rules
- 3.2.3 Decision making by panel of Arbitrators
- 3.2.4 Form and contents of Arbitral Award
- 3.2.5 Adherence to Allied laws for validity of Arbitral Award
- Indian Stamp Act
- Registration Act
- 3.3 Other provisions on Arbitral Award
- 3.3.1 Time limit for Arbitral Award
- 3.3.2 Fast track procedure
- 3.3.3 Settlement
- IV. Arbitration under Act of 1996 – III
- Arbitration under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 :
- 4.1 Regime of Costs
- 4.2 Termination of proceedings
- 4.3. Correction, Interpretation and Additional Award
- 4.4 Recourse against Arbitral Award
- 4.5 Finality and Enforcement of Arbitral Award
- 4.6 Appeals
- 4.7 Miscellaneous provisions
- 4.7.1 Deposits and lien
- 4.7.2 Non-Discharge on death
- 4.7.3 Insolvency of parties
- 4.7.4 Jurisdiction
- 4.7.5 Confidentiality
- 4.7.6 Applicability of Limitation Act, 1963
- 4.8. Arbitration Council of India
- 4.9 Enforcement of Foreign Awards in India
- V. Mediation
- Mediation
- 5.1 Mediation
- 5.2 Importance
- 5.3 Important Developments in Mediation
- 5.3.1 Growth of virtual dispute resolution
- 5.3.2 Pre-Institution Mediation
- 5.4 Mediation and Restorative Justice
- 5.4.1 Theory of restorative justice and its application
- 5.4.2 Gandhian principles of non-violent conflict resolution
- 5.4.3 Traditional mediation practices in India and abroad
- 5.5 Key concepts in mediation
- 5.5.1 Essential elements
- 5.5.2 Process and stages in mediation
- 5.5.3 Approaches to Mediation
- 5.5.4 Role of the mediator
- 5.6 Importance of communication in Mediation
- 5.6.1 Elements of verbal and non-verbal communication
- 5.6.2 Effective and ineffective communication techniques
- 5.7 Conducting Effective Mediation
- 5.7.1 Decision-making techniques
- 5.7.2 Problem-solving tactics
- 5.7.3 Ensuring positive outcomes
- 5.8 Qualities, Ethics and Role of a Mediator
- 5.8.1 Ideal Qualities and Skills of Mediators
- 5.8.2 Developing mediation skills
- 5.8.3 Code of ethics
- 5.8.4 Confidentiality requirements
- 5.9 Status of Mediated Agreements
- 5.9.1 Drafting of agreements
- 5.9.2 Sanctity of mediated agreements
- VI. Conciliation and Allied Laws
- Mediation. Conciliation and Allied Laws
- 1.1 Enforcement laws and procedures
- 1.1.1 Court decree for court-annexed mediation settlement
- 1.1.2 Vitiating factors: fraud, coercion, corruption, incapacity of a party or the settlement being contrary to
- public policy or Indian law. Need for Mediation-specific legislation to regulate and give legal sanctity to
- mediated settlements
- 1.2 Provisions of Conciliation under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
- 1.3 Allied Laws
- 1.3.1 Legal Services Authorization Act, 1987
- 1.3.2 Lok Adalats and Permanent Lok Adalats
- 1.3.3 Article 323-A and 323-B of Constitution of India
- 1.3.4 Provisions under CPC
- 1.3.5 The Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution and Mediation Rules, 2006
- 1.3.6 The Commercial Courts (Pre-Institution Mediation and Settlement) Rules 2018 (the PIMS Rules)
- 1.3.7 The Consumer Protection Act 2019
- 1.3.8 Judicial interpretation and relevant case law, dispute resolution institutions in India
⚖️ Part 1: Foundations & Arbitration (Units 1 – 4)
Focus: The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Amended 2015, 2019, 2021)
The Legal Architecture
- Section 5: Minimal Judicial Intervention (Courts must stay out unless invited).
- Section 7: The Arbitration Agreement must be in writing.
- Section 8: If a party goes to court despite an agreement, the Court must refer them to Arbitration.
- Section 11: Court’s power to appoint an Arbitrator if parties cannot agree.
- Section 16 (Competence-Competence): The Tribunal decides its own jurisdiction.
The “Award” & Recourse
|
Provision |
Concept |
Crucial Detail |
|
Section 31 |
Form of Award |
Must be written, signed, and reasoned. |
|
Section 34 |
Setting Aside |
Not an appeal! Only for “Patent Illegality” or “Public Policy” violations. |
|
Section 36 |
Enforcement |
Once the 90-day challenge period ends, it is a Court Decree. |
|
Section 37 |
Appeals |
Only allowed against specific orders (like refusing an injunction). |
🤝 Part 2: Mediation & Conciliation (Unit 5)
Focus: The Mediation Act, 2023 & Facilitative Justice
The Mediation Logic
- Role of Mediator: A facilitator, not a judge. They use “Active Listening” and “Caucus” (private meetings).
- The Mediation Act, 2023: Now provides a 180-day limit for mediation and makes the settlement strictly enforceable.
- Pre-Institution Mediation (PIMS): Mandatory for Commercial Suits unless there is an urgent need for an injunction.
- Restorative Justice: Focuses on “Healing” the relationship (Gandhian principles) rather than “Legal Winning.”
The Mediation Process
- Opening: Rules and confidentiality.
- Joint Session: Venting and storytelling.
- Caucus: Finding the “Hidden Interest” (The Orange Analogy).
- Agreement: Drafting a Win-Win settlement.
🏛️ Part 3: Allied Laws & Lok Adalats (Unit 6)
Focus: The Wider ADR Ecosystem
The Constitutional & Statutory Network
- Article 39A: The “Root”—Mandates free legal aid and ADR.
- Section 89 CPC: The “Bridge”—The Judge’s duty to suggest ADR.
- Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987: The parent act for Lok Adalats.
- Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Mandatory “Mediation Cells” for consumers.
Lok Adalat vs. Permanent Lok Adalat
|
Feature |
Lok Adalat |
Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) |
|
Nature |
Temporary/Periodic. |
Sitting in a fixed location for Public Utilities. |
|
Consent |
Both parties must agree to a settlement. |
Can decide on “Merits” if parties don’t agree. |
|
Finality |
Award is final; No Appeal lies anywhere. |
Award is final and binding. |
🚀 Final “Exam-Ready” Landmarks
- Afcons Infrastructure: Defined which cases are fit for ADR (Section 89 CPC).
- BALCO: Clarified the “Seat” vs. “Venue” concept in International Arbitration.
- Perkins Eastman: Stopped “One-Sided” appointment of Arbitrators.
- Patil Automation: Made Pre-Institution Mediation Mandatory for Commercial suits.
🔑 Exam “Golden Key” Maxim
Latin Maxim: Ab abusu ad usum non valet consequentia
(Definition: “A conclusion from the abuse of a thing to its use is not valid.” Use this to argue that just because ADR is sometimes “abused” to delay cases, it doesn’t mean the system itself isn’t incredibly useful and necessary.)